Pro Tools 11 & Control 24. I have a control 24 that I plan to use with a modded 002 or purchase a UFX, regardless of which interface I use would I still be able to. Pro Tools redefined the music, film, and TV industry, providing everything you need to compose, record, edit, and mix music and audio.

Parallel interface. The device I'm talking to is acting as an RF slave and will only respond back to my Arduino/RF device after a command has been transmitted. I'll have to conquer that with some software SPI for another module I'm using for this project. The RF chip handles packet synchronization with OOK modulation, I think what you're getting at is the condition under which the Arduino reads its own receive buffer in a bad state. I also have RF preamble and sync bytes disabled as I want to read anything that is broadcasted for the frequency I've configured the CC110X with. I'm not really concerned about the garbage data for the time being.

Hi, This has been a long term wish of mine to continue using my Digidesign Pro Control and Fader pack with Pro Tools beyond Pro Tools 10. For those who do not know this is an ethernet connected control surface the sends a form of midi over ethernet but its not quite so literal as that. Avid (Owners of Digidesign who have since retired the name) dropped support for the product with Pro Tools at PT10 and refuse to develop the required driver to continue using the unit any further. So this brings me to the development of an alternative way of using this unit, I love the hardware and will not stop using it so another way must be found. My investigations have lead me to one person 'Indys' who had successfully developed a bridge between the hardware (actually a Control 24 rather than Pro Control but works on the same protocol) the full thread is here on the Reaper user forum: forum.cockos /showthread.php?t=38389&highlight=control+24 Sadly he was put off by potential legal trouble from Avid (although this is questionable as to whether it even has any substance) and did not release it as a publicly available product. Charlie parker complete savoy & dial master takes rar. Legal questions aside (I'm not interested in discussing this) I would like to try and do the same thing for personal use if nothing else.

Sadly I have zero programming knowledge and only have the info in the thread to go by, It appears the data was captured from the hardware using winpcap.org which is readily available but i dont know how to read the data or translate it and I'm wondering if Bome Midi Translator would make the task easier? Can BMT read the data coming in over the network port and translate to MIDI and vice versa to feed back to the hardware (fader movement and LED Status etc)? If BMT cannot do it does anyone know enough about what has been discussed in the thread to suggest how i go about learning the language of the data (what even the language is) do do it in the same way as the guy 'Indys' appeared to do it? I'm willing to learn if anyone can help point me in the right direction, there literally hundreds of people out there in the same situation that just want to be able to use their units but Avid are a brickwall for communication about it. I've tried to contact 'Indys' but not heard back from him yet so in the meantime maybe some of you can help?

Hi, seems that this question was too abstract for anybody to reply! The short answer is that MT Pro cannot access Ethernet frames directly -- which is, however, required for this functionality (I believe). Legal questions aside, we could potentially add support for this, but that would be quite a lot of programming for the Pro Control, an EOL product. Just for completeness I mention that we do payed custom programming for MT Pro or otherwise, however, the scope of this project is probably too big to make any sense financially (definitely a 4 digit dollar amount).

Sorry I cannot help here. Maybe you can persuade Indys to release the source code on e.g. That should be a lot less legal risk for him. Regards, Florian. Ok thanks, I would have thought EOL products are the perfect example of a great use for your products (to give them a continued life beyond the manufacturers support) there's a lot of products that run on this protocol (known as diginet) the Pro Control, control 24, C24, D Command/D Control etc all of which cost literally thousands of $ and there are thousands of units out there. So I'm sure users would rather pay to be able to continue using them than have to ditch them. I'm not at all sure of the legal problems after all there is no hacking or decrypting required as the data steam is not encrypted at all its surely no different to reading any other data stream from any other device, the information is not even proprietary it's just MIDI Hex which is an open format.